Suggestion ranger skills?

[Dielan9999]

yes, but how much dammage does the bow do for those classes?

20something for the ranger
10-14ish for the rest, however I'm not sure.

Pretty sure 20something is right for the ranger though.

 

[Faunherer]

Ya, it is not a matter of how much damage it does. That does not require an entirely new path. It is perfectly fine how it is.

 

[WoleverEntun]

I dont think an archer class would be good right now, maybe a month ago, when only rangers could use bows.

 

[donnymeyer]

i posted something about this 5 months ago...
whatever i re pathed

 

[SaberStone]

Ive only skimmed through most of these posts but maybe the super arrow could use all mana so its an al in one shot. the skill shud not show on chat cuz well.. its an assassination not public announcement

 

[donnymeyer]

that would be great... why dont we turn this into a ranger skills post? the archer idea is over.

 

[Faunherer]

I feel as if ranger has enough skills, we are OP almost. Unless you have something really good that is balanced, I doubt any of the skills will be considered. Think of some skills for less-played classes, like bloodmage or dreadknight, they need some boosts.

 

[donnymeyer]

well i would like ./ wallclimb for something...

 

[Tyronus]

Well me and pure were brain storming for a wall climber. Now this would most likely be a rogue class. The skills would be port wall climbing (within reason) zeal port and so on. I would think the class to be weak in health and pretty strong in attack.

 

[donnymeyer]

guess what i just did? brought this post back to life

 

[c12095]

guess what i just did? brought this post back to life

Bastard

 

[donnymeyer]

Bastard

your the third person that said that to me this week... lol

 

[Dielan9999]

I just don't like the idea.

Ranger is a pretty solid class. Popular too.

 

[donnymeyer]

I just don't like the idea.

Ranger is a pretty solid class. Popular too.

i agree, but kain said earlier herocraft was having an expansion or something, so im just throwing out an old idea.

 

[WoleverEntun]

An archer class would be an almost pointless duplicate of a ranger. Some of the skills are cool though.

 

[donnymeyer]

An archer class would be an almost pointless duplicate of a ranger. Some of the skills are cool though.

that was my objective in this: 1. kain reads through it
2. looks at skills
3. likes 1-2 skills
4. adds one or two
5. locks thread.

 

[Razael6]

I actually agree, when I get back to MC and HC I want to use a bow, yet I don't want to go through the melee rogue. And it seems you thought this out pretty well, I agree this would be a good idea. I agree because well the bow is just a completely different thing than rogue's high damage sneaking up close and little armor so it makes no sense for the ranger to be a rogue thing since the only thing in common is that rangers are stealthish.

 

[donnymeyer]

I actually agree, when I get back to MC and HC I want to use a bow, yet I don't want to go through the melee rogue. And it seems you thought this out pretty well, I agree this would be a good idea. I agree because well the bow is just a completely different thing than rogue's high damage sneaking up close and little armor so it makes no sense for the ranger to be a rogue thing since the only thing in common is that rangers are stealthish.

you have taken the words from my mouth

 

[donnymeyer]

I really like the idea of this, gives rangers more reason to play it smart when their ambushing their target insted of root and run 4 times until their dead. However the damage seems to be far to high, due to the fact that they can come in and root you then take the time to aim and snipe you for close to half your hp if not more depending on your class.

c12095 im guessing your opinion changed too...

 

[Razael6]

Well now only ranger and bard get bows instead of like all of them, and the bards have no bow skills, so this is another reason this is a better idea now.