@
kevinlive
You don't want "shit" posted on here, maybe you should try opening your eyes and seeing that other players aren't the ones posting "shit". You have numerous players countering your arguments, and the majority of your responses have been half assed beginning and ending with an insult to the poster. You want to be taken seriously? Quit being an ass to people trying to counter an argument. You have an inflated ego currently and anyone in this thread that disagrees is automatically wrong in your book.
This thread is pathetic and I am taking nothing you say seriously until you change your attitude on this whole subject. That does not mean you have to change your viewpoint, so don't try and twist words, I want you to be able to respectfully and logically explain your side, with numbers and examples to back you up, not this "I have been all classes I know what i'm talking about" crap, that doesn't fly. You need to be able to show and prove your points, we don't take your word for this stuff until you have proven you really do know what your talking about. At this point, with all these counters to your argument, it is VERY clear you don't know for sure what your talking about until you prove yourself right, not because you think yourself right.
Yeah, you're not making a valid point either; bashing someone doesn't make it a valid argument. I could call your post "shit" because you haven't backed up too why his post was "shit".
As for the topic goes; this is not a "buff me, nerf them" post. We're trying to persuade each other as to why classes aren't balanced. Of course rogues are going to call warriors OP, they are dominated 80% of the time, and by a LONG SHOT; it's making the gameplay more dull then anything.
Here is my argument as too why dragoons are strong....
Dragoons are a problem. When you give someone the ability to run from almost any situation (if your not dumb), and the ability to 5 shot any rogues, it will OBVIOUSLY cause complaints. This is one of the flaws to r-p-s.... People play'd rogues because they have the false reputation of being able to dish out SERIOUS damage, when in reality; armor > dps....
A dragoon at lvl 60 will get 70 damage, and a lvl 60 ninja would get about 100 damage. At first look, people will go "danngg ninja op" disregarding the fact that dragoons can disarm, and negate 60% of it. Disarm is almost like a indirect silence, as a lot of skills require the use of a sword to use.
Skills also reset the damage counter, so you can hit skill hit skill hit, in half a second. Dragoons can do it well, due too the fact that a lot of their skills don't knock enemies back super distances; even if they do, jump....
I've said this once, and i'll say it again.... Things on paper, are seriously different then things that happen in the game. Before anyone spec'd (sept that one ranger) people complained about rogue's kick. So they got a nerf... It's easy to see a rogue kill other classes, as they have the most dps early on.
So why when we ask for compensation, we get bashed?
People complained about ninja's damage because they are made to deal A LOT OF DAMAGE.... so what happens? they get nerf'd....
The only people i really see arguing against us are other warriors. I respect that, they like to keep their classes just the way they are, as they are the only ones who really know how the class works. So don't use a stupid argument like "oh everyone complaining are only rogues...." well just letting you know; statistically speaking; there are only 4 classes to choose from, therefore 25% of the server is rogues. (ik this is not true, but i can guarantee you no one has actually made a count) So don't use that as a supporting argument.
My argument to R-P-S gameplay
This is an mmorpg, not a moba like league or dota. We cannot always tell who we are fighting 90% of the time, we cannot always pick ahead of time a counter to every class; thats just ridiculous. New players will get frustrated, as they don't have the opportunity to fight with everyone else. Town's are getting highly selective, which is a noob repellent.
