1st page, when you were a supporter of this ideaNo time to find what that quote was directed at, I will check tommorow!
I dont think an archer class would be good right now, maybe a month ago, when only rangers could use bows.
Well now only ranger and bard get bows instead of like all of them, and the bards have no bow skills, so this is another reason this is a better idea now.
still pessimistic Danda?This Path would be far too over powered in comparison to any of the other paths.
Most paths have no more than 3 skills.
You are suggesting a skill that does equal damage to the highest damage nuke in the game atm for a path.
As if that class wasnt already rediculous with this one skill all of its other skills would make as powerful as most specs. This is one of the most imbalanced suggestions I have ever seen.
No offense :/
the first time you posted that you thought it was one of the worst suggestions ever. just wonderingI'm not pessimistic I was just pointing out that the numbers you were using were a little high.
i'd apply but i too young D: also, to clear this up, ill change the title.The Balance team is a newly founded staff team that tests class balance and will attempt to make all classes appealing in their own way while keeping everything balanced.
it was just a general changeRight now the Balance Team is not adding skill, but are modifying the current skills to make certain class more/less powerful and some classes more appealing to play.
You need a better dictionary. We will not be changing the name of Ranger.I never did understand why they called it ranger. Official Ranger definition - a soldier specially trained in close-range fighting and in raiding tactics.
If not a new class, a name change should be in order.