Silk Touch or something like that? xDIsn't there's a skill for alchemist that transmutes 64 coal for 1 diamond already? I know you said coal ore, but why would you waste a *too tired to remember the enchant that gives you back stone, coal ores, redstone ore, etc..*
pick?
I'm pretty tired, and I guess was not thinking very clearly when I posted this. I was using a silk touch pick, but they are not easily obtainable. Perhaps instead it could be something like:Isn't there's a skill for alchemist that transmutes 64 coal for 1 diamond already? I know you said coal ore, but why would you waste a *too tired to remember the enchant that gives you back stone, coal ores, redstone ore, etc..*
pick?
Nah, that wouldn't really make any sense, now would it?How about we make smeltgold have a regeant of 1 coal but there is a 3% chance of getting a diamond along with the gold.
My first thought of this was people were going to get tons of diamonds off of this. How? MassEncaseDiamond, place it all down, use a fortune pick on it all to get lots more diamond, repeat. Unless of course they restricted it so you couldn't place the diamond ore..EncaseDiamond skill
yeah thatSilk Touch or something like that? xD
Ores are already restricted - you can't place them, unless it changed from whe I last played...? Danda ?My first thought of this was people were going to get tons of diamonds off of this. How? MassEncaseDiamond, place it all down, use a fortune pick on it all to get lots more diamond, repeat. Unless of course they restricted it so you couldn't place the diamond ore..
Unless of course they restricted it so you couldn't place the diamond ore..
You can place redstone ore but not coal ore
I am fairly certain you cannot place iron ore either.
Welp, there's your answer!No, redstone is the only one
Well, it a percent chance, so why would you waste a stack or coal for a "Chance" to get diamond? Would just be a useless skill, because alch has a 100% chance.Returning items on failed attempts is bad. Rather just burn it up.