Suggestion Enchanter Dis Enchant

[JupiterRome]

I think DisEnchant should just let you pick one Enchantment To take off and Item In case it has like sharp 10 but the KnockBack ruins it.

 

[CoolBeans279]

I think DisEnchant should just let you pick one Enchantment To take off and Item In case it has like sharp 10 but the KnockBack ruins it.

That'd be amazing, take eff 5 off glad shovel

 

[Carbash]

Fire aspect off of everything.

 

[w0nd3rb0y]

Fire aspect off of everything.

Fa too good

 

[MCderpy12]

You could make the skill have a lets say 20% chance of only removing that enchant and not all enchants on that item, otherwise people would just do what carbash said, and take fire aspect off everything.

 

[JupiterRome]

You could make the skill have a lets say 20% chance of only removing that enchant and not all enchants on that item, otherwise people would just do what carbash said, and take fire aspect off everything.

This is a bad thing how?

 

[MCderpy12]

This is a bad thing how?

tbh idk, it just feels overpowered. Like if you could repair a enchanted tool without the chance of losing the enchants, that would be OP.

 

[JupiterRome]

tbh idk, it just feels overpowered. Like if you could repair a enchanted tool without the chance of losing the enchants, that would be OP.

Not really the same thing...

 

[MCderpy12]

Not really the same thing...

Well
I will let you have your opinion,

But to be honest, I really don't care either way

 

[w0nd3rb0y]

You could make the skill have a lets say 20% chance of only removing that enchant and not all enchants on that item, otherwise people would just do what carbash said, and take fire aspect off everything.

Why would people remove fire aspect?

 

[MCderpy12]

Why would people remove fire aspect?

Just what carbash said

 

[w0nd3rb0y]

Just what carbash said

I understand, however that would not be overpowered, removing fire aspect would be "nerfing" the weapon.

 

[Irishman81]

I understand, however that would not be overpowered, removing fire aspect would be "nerfing" the weapon.

Certain classes hate having fire aspect on a weapon. Ninja for example can get way more hits off of their target isn't on fire

 

[w0nd3rb0y]

Certain classes hate having fire aspect on a weapon. Ninja for example can get way more hits off of their target isn't on fire

Maybe more hits, but less dmg overall, fire tics do a ton of dmg, will allow you to keep up consistent dmg, allow for more backstabs during a chase do to the fact that it slows down your target, and any time you're not hitting target, dmg is still being applied. 1 hit with a weapon, plus fire tics do around 100 dmg. I would still like fa as a ninja.

 

[JupiterRome]

Maybe more hits, but less dmg overall, fire tics do a ton of dmg, will allow you to keep up consistent dmg, allow for more backstabs during a chase do to the fact that it slows down your target, and any time you're not hitting target, dmg is still being applied. 1 hit with a weapon, plus fire tics do around 100 dmg. I would still like fa as a ninja.

TBH This is not the place for that discussion BUT....
Ninja Fire ticks 1v1 = Good
Ninja Fire Ticks Sneaking Up on someone = Less Backstabs which can change a fight